CSR Tools

ESRS Topic Structure: these are the Planned Changes

Overview of the new ESRS topic structure: Planned changes for 2025, impact on companies, and relevance for sustainability reports.

Last updated on: May 23, 2026
In brief
  • The ESRS are being restructured from three tiers (topics, sub-topics, sub-sub-topics) down to two tiers, removing or integrating the most granular level.
  • On 6 May 2026 the EU Commission published a draft of simplified ("revised") ESRS for consultation, cutting mandatory data points by over 60% and total data points by over 70%.
  • Key changes affect all ten standards: E1 stays unchanged; E2 and E3 consolidate; E4 and E5 broaden scope; S1 and S2 merge; G1 integrates anti-corruption and animal welfare under corporate culture.
  • Companies already using the ESRS should check whether removed sub-topics remain material for their specific sector and update their materiality assessment accordingly.
  • The ESRS data points template helps companies track exactly which data points still apply after the restructuring.

The European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) form the core of the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Previously, the structure was three-tiered:

  • Topics (e.g., climate change, biodiversity, workforce),
  • Sub-topics,
  • Sub-sub-topics (e.g., specific aspects like child labor, water withdrawal, or animal welfare).

This level of detail offered the advantage of clear guidance but brought high complexity for many companies, especially small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

Planned Changes to the ESRS Topic Structure: from Three to Two Tiers

The proposal for adapting the ESRS foresees a streamlining: in the future, there will only be topics and sub-topics. Sub-sub-topics will be removed or integrated into the higher level.

Commission draft published on 6 May 2026

On 6 May 2026, the EU Commission published a draft of simplified ("revised") ESRS for public consultation. The key figures: mandatory data points cut by over 60%, total data points by over 70%, and estimated reporting costs per company down by over 30%. The feedback period ran until 3 June 2026. A final delegated act is expected later in 2026.

Key Changes at a Glance:

  • E1 Climate Change: No changes. Focus remains on climate protection, adaptation, and energy.
  • E2 Pollution: "Pollution of living organisms and food resources" is removed (too sector-specific, hardly measurable). Substance-related topics are merged.
  • E3 Water and Marine Resources: Sub-sub-topics like "water consumption" become independent sub-topics. "Discharge into oceans" is removed, "water storage" is newly added. The use of marine resources will be covered in other standards in the future.
  • E4 Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Drivers such as invasive species are expanded. Examples (species extinction, land degradation) are removed for more flexibility and fewer checklists.
  • E5 Circular Economy: Resource inflows and outflows remain, but services are now also considered. Marine resources are moved here.
  • S1 and S2 Workforce: Own employees and value chain are merged into a unified logic for HR topics.
  • S3 Affected Communities: Detailed topics (housing, nutrition, safety) are integrated into broader categories.
  • S4 Consumers and End-users: Data protection, child protection, access to information, etc., merge into larger blocks.
  • G1 Corporate Governance: Topics such as corruption, whistleblowing, and animal welfare are no longer reported individually, but within the framework of "corporate culture."

Aktualisierte ESRS-Themenstruktur

Why are these Changes to the ESRS Topic Structure Being Proposed?

The European Commission and EFRAG aim to achieve the following with the restructuring under the Omnibus Proposal:

  1. Reduce complexity: Especially for SMEs who might be overwhelmed by CSRD reporting obligations, the reduction of the ESRS topic structure offers a real simplification.
  2. Create more flexibility: Companies should no longer tick off rigid checklists but identify relevant topics for their context. They can choose between a top-down and a bottom-up approach for identifying material topics.
  3. Strengthen the materiality assessment: Companies must prioritize for themselves, through the Materiality Assessment, which topics are material and thus subject to reporting.

Who is this Relevant for?

  • SMEs and mid-sized companies that will no longer fall under the CSRD obligation but still wish to publish a simplified sustainability report on a voluntary basis (e.g., VSME Standard) -- fewer detailed requirements, more self-responsibility.
  • Large companies that must report comprehensively under the CSRD -- they benefit from a clearer structure but must carefully assess whether removed details remain material for their industry.
  • CSRD consultancies, ESG software providers (such as Materiality Master) and auditors who need to adapt their tools and processes.
Status: still in consultation as of June 2026

The Commission draft published on 6 May 2026 is still going through the legislative process. A final adoption of the revised ESRS delegated act is expected later in 2026. Companies should familiarize themselves with the possible changes now to be prepared, especially regarding the execution of the materiality assessment and internal data processes.

Note: The adjustment of the ESRS topic structure is one of numerous proposed changes in the ESRS Set 1 Exposure Draft.

Detailed Overview of all Changes in the ESRS Topic Structure

ESRS topicOriginal sub-sub-topicNew mapping in 2025 proposalStatus / changeNote / rationale
E1 Climate changeClimate change mitigationClimate change mitigationUnchanged
E1 Climate changeClimate change adaptationClimate change adaptationUnchanged
E1 Climate changeEnergyEnergyUnchanged
E2 PollutionPollution of airPollution of airUnchanged
E2 PollutionPollution of waterPollution of waterUnchanged
E2 PollutionPollution of soilPollution of soilUnchanged
E2 PollutionPollution of living organisms and food resourcesRemovedRemovedNo disclosure / too sector-specific
E2 PollutionSubstances of concernSubstances of concern (incl. very high concern)MergedMerged with "very high concern"
E2 PollutionSubstances of very high concernSubstances of concern (incl. very high concern)MergedMerged into "concern"
E2 PollutionMicroplasticsMicroplasticsUnchanged
E3 Water and marine resourcesWater consumptionWater consumption (now sub-topic)MovedFrom sub-sub to sub-topic
E3 Water and marine resourcesWater withdrawalsWater withdrawals (now sub-topic)MovedFrom sub-sub to sub-topic
E3 Water and marine resourcesWater dischargesWater discharges (now sub-topic)MovedFrom sub-sub to sub-topic
E3 Water and marine resourcesWater discharges into oceansRemovedRemovedCovered via ESRS 1
E3 Water and marine resourcesWater storageWater storageNewNewly introduced
E3 Water and marine resourcesExtraction and use of marine resourcesMoved to E5MovedNow in E5
E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems (direct drivers of biodiversity loss)Climate changeDrivers of biodiversity and ecosystem change (terrestrial and marine)ConsolidatedMarine drivers added
E4 Biodiversity and ecosystemsLand-use change; freshwater/sea-use changeDrivers of biodiversity and ecosystem changeConsolidatedBroader scope
E4 Biodiversity and ecosystemsDirect exploitationDrivers of biodiversity and ecosystem changeConsolidatedBroader scope
E4 Biodiversity and ecosystemsInvasive alien speciesDrivers of biodiversity and ecosystem changeConsolidatedBroader scope
E4 Biodiversity and ecosystemsPollutionDrivers of biodiversity and ecosystem changeConsolidatedBroader scope
E4 Biodiversity and ecosystemsOtherDrivers of biodiversity and ecosystem changeConsolidatedBroader scope
E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems (state of species -- examples)Species population size (example)RemovedExample removedExamples deleted
E4 Biodiversity and ecosystemsSpecies extinction risk (example)RemovedExample removedExamples deleted
E4 Biodiversity and ecosystemsLand degradation (example)RemovedExample removedExamples deleted
E4 Biodiversity and ecosystemsDesertification (example)RemovedExample removedExamples deleted
E4 Biodiversity and ecosystemsSoil sealing (example)RemovedExample removedExamples deleted
E4 Biodiversity and ecosystemsEcosystem servicesEcosystem servicesUnchangedEditorial
E5 Circular economyResource inflows incl. resource useResource inflowsEdited"incl. use" removed
E5 Circular economyResource outflows: products and materialsResource outflows: products and servicesExpandedServices added
E5 Circular economyWasteWasteUnchangedEditorial
E5 Circular economyMarine resources (from E3)Marine resourcesMovedIntegrated here
S1 Own workforceSecure employmentMerged into new combined S1/S2 block "Own workforce and workers in the value chain"MergedS1+S2 combined
S1 Own workforceWorking timeMerged into S1/S2 blockMerged
S1 Own workforceAdequate wagesMerged into S1/S2 blockMerged
S1 Own workforceSocial dialogueMerged into S1/S2 blockMerged
S1 Own workforceFreedom of association; works councils; rightsMerged into S1/S2 blockMerged
S1 Own workforceCollective bargaining (incl. coverage)Merged into S1/S2 blockMerged
S1 Own workforceWork-life balanceMerged into S1/S2 blockMerged
S1 Own workforceHealth and safetyMerged into S1/S2 blockMerged
S1 Own workforceGender equality and equal payMerged into S1/S2 blockMerged
S1 Own workforceTraining and skills developmentMerged into S1/S2 blockMerged
S1 Own workforceEmployment and inclusion of persons with disabilitiesMerged into S1/S2 blockMerged
S1 Own workforceMeasures against violence and harassmentMerged into S1/S2 blockMerged
S1 Own workforceDiversityMerged into S1/S2 blockMerged
S1 Own workforceChild labourMerged into S1/S2 block (other labour-related rights)Merged
S1 Own workforceForced labourMerged into S1/S2 block (other labour-related rights)Merged
S1 Own workforceAdequate housingMerged into S1/S2 block (other labour-related rights)Merged
S1 Own workforcePrivacyMerged into S1/S2 block (other labour-related rights)Merged
S2 Workers in the value chain(Analogous to S1: all sub-sub-topics)Integrated into S1/S2 combined blockMerged
S3 Affected communitiesAdequate housingEconomic, social and cultural rightsConsolidated
S3 Affected communitiesAdequate foodEconomic, social and cultural rightsConsolidated
S3 Affected communitiesWater and sanitationEconomic, social and cultural rightsConsolidated
S3 Affected communitiesLand-related impactsEconomic, social and cultural rightsConsolidated
S3 Affected communitiesSecurity-related impactsEconomic, social and cultural rightsConsolidated
S3 Affected communitiesFreedom of expressionCivil and political rightsConsolidated
S3 Affected communitiesFreedom of assemblyCivil and political rightsConsolidated
S3 Affected communitiesImpacts on human rights defendersCivil and political rightsConsolidated
S3 Affected communitiesFree, prior and informed consent (FPIC)Rights of indigenous peoplesUnchanged
S3 Affected communitiesSelf-determinationRights of indigenous peoplesUnchanged
S3 Affected communitiesCultural rightsRights of indigenous peoplesUnchanged
S4 Consumers and end-usersPrivacyInformation-related impactsConsolidated
S4 Consumers and end-usersFreedom of expressionInformation-related impactsConsolidated
S4 Consumers and end-usersAccess to informationInformation-related impactsConsolidated
S4 Consumers and end-usersHealth and safetyPersonal safetyConsolidated
S4 Consumers and end-usersSecurity of personPersonal safetyConsolidated
S4 Consumers and end-usersProtection of childrenPersonal safetyConsolidated
S4 Consumers and end-usersNon-discriminationSocial inclusionConsolidated
S4 Consumers and end-usersAccess to products and servicesSocial inclusionConsolidated
S4 Consumers and end-usersResponsible marketing practicesSocial inclusionConsolidated
G1 Business conductCorporate cultureCorporate culture (incl. anti-corruption, whistleblowers, animal welfare)ConsolidatedIntegrated
G1 Business conductCorruption and briberyCorporate cultureConsolidated
G1 Business conductWhistleblowers protectionCorporate cultureConsolidated
G1 Business conductAnimal welfareCorporate cultureConsolidated
G1 Business conductPolitical influence and lobbyingPolitical influence and lobbying (editorial)UnchangedMinor edits
G1 Business conductSupplier relationships incl. payment practicesSupplier relationships (editorial)UnchangedMinor edits

Conclusion on the Updated ESRS Structure

The planned ESRS streamlining brings both opportunities and challenges for companies:

  • Opportunity: Less complexity and a clearer two-tier structure reduce reporting burden, especially for smaller teams.
  • Opportunity: The simplified materiality assessment makes it easier to focus on what genuinely matters for your business.
  • Challenge: Existing materiality assessments should be reviewed and adapted to the new ESRS topic structure.
  • Challenge: Removed sub-topics (e.g., organisms, animal welfare as a standalone topic) may still be material for specific industries and should not be overlooked.

Companies should closely follow developments, stay up-to-date via resources like the CSRD Compass Newsletter, update their materiality assessment, and verify whether removed sub-topics remain reportable in their sector.

ESRS data points template

Keep track of which ESRS data points apply to your company after the restructuring. The ESRS data points template maps all relevant data points so you can immediately see what still applies and what has changed.

View the template

Frequently asked questions about the ESRS topic structure

What does the change from three tiers to two tiers mean in practice?

Under the current ESRS, companies must navigate topics, sub-topics, and sub-sub-topics. The planned revision removes the sub-sub-topic level. Those granular details are either merged into the sub-topic level above them or dropped entirely. The result is fewer line items to assess in your materiality process and fewer potential disclosure requirements.

Are the revised ESRS already in force?

No. As of June 2026, the EU Commission published a draft for consultation on 6 May 2026. The feedback period closed on 3 June 2026. A final delegated act is expected later in 2026. Until the revised standards are formally adopted, companies subject to CSRD should continue working with the current ESRS Set 1.

Do I need to redo my materiality assessment when the new structure is adopted?

You do not need to start from scratch, but a review is necessary. Some sub-sub-topics that were previously assessed separately are now merged or removed. You need to check that your existing assessments still cover the consolidated topics correctly, and confirm that any dropped topics are genuinely not material for your sector before removing them from your report.

Which ESRS standard changes the most under the restructuring?

The social standards see the most structural change. S1 (own workforce) and S2 (workers in the value chain) are merged into a single combined block. G1 also integrates previously standalone topics such as anti-corruption, whistleblower protection, and animal welfare under a single "corporate culture" sub-topic. E1 (climate change) is the only standard that remains entirely unchanged.