CSR Tools
CSRD explained in under 100 words

CSRD explained in under 100 words

In 100 words, you will receive a concise explanation of what CSRD is and for whom, as well as an insight into comparable global reporting approaches.

Last updated on: September 29, 2026
In brief
  • The CSRD is an EU directive requiring large companies to report transparently on their social and environmental impact.
  • The Omnibus Directive has been in force since 18 March 2026: from financial year 2027, reporting is mandatory only for companies with more than 1,000 employees AND more than €450m net turnover (both criteria must be met).
  • The CSRD uses the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) as its reporting framework.
  • Similar sustainability reporting requirements exist globally; the ISSB standards IFRS S1/S2 are now the global reference framework, though the CSRD remains the most binding framework.
  • Even companies outside the EU can be indirectly affected through Scope 3 reporting requirements in their supply chains.
Thresholds updated as of March 2026

The Omnibus package took effect on 18 March 2026. The reporting scope has been significantly narrowed. For the most current information on who is now required to report, read our post: CSRD Omnibus – What the EU proposal means for companies.

I recently attended an expert webinar on the topic of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). At the end of the event, one of the participants wrote in the chat "I'm still not sure what exactly CSRD is…".

Many of us know that sustainability, and sustainability reporting in particular, is currently a very hot topic. It is a topic that affects numerous companies in Germany and still generates many question marks in the minds of those responsible.

Here is our attempt to explain the CSRD simply with an analogy – in less than 100 words.

CSRD explained simply as an analogy

Think of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) as the recipe book for corporate sustainability:

Just as a cookbook provides detailed instructions and ingredients for a dish, the CSRD specifies which "ingredients" (information) companies must include in their sustainability reports. The aim is to promote "delicious" (sustainable and socially responsible) corporate governance by providing clear and comparable "recipes" (reporting standards) for everyone. This allows "guests" (investors, stakeholders) to select and rate the "dishes" (companies) based on their "taste" (sustainability performance), encouraging the "kitchens" (companies) to develop "healthier" and "tastier" options.

Is the analogy not within your grasp? No problem! Here is an attempt to explain CSRD in under 100 words without analogy:

CSRD explained in under 100 words

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is an EU directive that obliges certain companies to report transparently on their social and environmental impact. The focus is on the disclosure of sustainability-related information to inform investors, regulators and the public about the sustainability performance of companies. The CSRD aims to promote sustainable investment by providing clear and comparable data and encouraging companies to disclose their sustainable development practices and policies. By improving transparency and accountability, the directive supports the EU in its efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

If you want to understand the CSRD in detail and also the connections with the ESRS, the EU taxonomy or even the concept of double materiality, it is much more complicated. Fortunately, we have put together a guide to creating a materiality assessment and further information on double materiality assessment for you.

For which companies is the CSRD relevant?

Having explained CSRD in under 100 words, let's now look at who the regulations are relevant for.

The CSRD, with its strong focus on transparent, consistent and comparable sustainability information, is pushing EU companies to shed more light on their ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) efforts.

New thresholds in force since 18 March 2026

Under the Omnibus package, the reporting obligation applies from financial year 2027 only to companies with more than 1,000 employees AND more than €450m net turnover. Both criteria must be met cumulatively. Many companies that previously expected to report under the old "2 of 3 criteria" (250 employees / €50m turnover / €25m balance sheet) are no longer in scope.

Are only German companies affected by the CSRD?

No, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive is an EU directive. Accordingly, all companies within the European Union that fulfill the requirements are affected by the CSRD. From financial year 2027, this applies to companies with more than 1,000 employees and more than €450m net turnover; listed SMEs are no longer in scope. The CSRD can also be relevant for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the EU if they are part of the supply chain of an obligated company.

Companies outside the EU are also affected if they conduct significant business in the EU, including a physical presence. After the Omnibus changes, the CSRD applies to non-EU groups from financial year 2028 at the earliest if they meet both of the following criteria:

  • more than €450m net turnover in the EU; and
  • an EU subsidiary or EU branch with more than €200m turnover

A PwC CSRD study published in October 2023 reveals the progress of companies in the DACH region with the implementation of ESRS requirements and presents a surprising result regarding the preferred software solution for CSRD reporting.

Indirect impact

EU companies must not only disclose their own greenhouse gas emissions (GHG emissions) as part of the CSRD. They must also report on so-called Scope 3 emissions, i.e. the GHG emissions of the entire value chain. It is therefore to be expected that companies from the EU will increasingly require their suppliers and service providers outside the EU to provide them with information on their GHG emissions. This means that companies outside the EU may also be indirectly affected by the CSRD reporting obligation.

Quick CSRD scope check

Not sure whether your company is in scope after the new thresholds? Use our free instant check to find out in minutes.

Start free check

Are there similar regulations on CSRD in other countries?

Akteurslandschaft im Kontext Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung (CSRD) – Global, EU und Deutschland

Source: German Council for Sustainable Development

USA

On March 21, 2022, the US Securities and Exchange Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed regulations that would require companies (registrants) to include certain climate-related disclosures in their registration statements and periodic reports. These include information on climate-related risks that are likely to have a material impact on their business, results of operations or financial condition, and certain climate-related financial metrics in their audited financial statements. Disclosure of the registrant's greenhouse gas emissions would also be required. The scaled-back SEC climate rule adopted in March 2024 never took effect, however: it was stayed, and the SEC abandoned its defense in court in 2025.

The SEC proposal drew on the GHG Protocol and the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and provided for disclosure in the annual report on Form 10-K. The TCFD itself was disbanded in 2023 and its work handed over to the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB).

Other American countries

The Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB), often mentioned in this context, was not a Canadian but an international body; it was consolidated into the IFRS Foundation in 2022, and its framework feeds into the ISSB standards. South American countries such as Brazil are showing increasing recognition of the importance of ESG factors with initiatives such as the Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Index.

Asia

Asia, with its diverse economic landscape, presents a range of different approaches to sustainability reporting. In Japan, the Sustainability Standards Board of Japan (SSBJ) published its first sustainability disclosure standards, aligned with IFRS S1/S2, on 5 March 2025; the stock exchange JPX supplements this with an ESG disclosure handbook for listed companies. Singapore offers clear guidelines for companies with its "Sustainability Reporting Guide". The Asian region shows a varied but consistently positive development towards the establishment of sustainable business practices, whereby the focus is often strongly on environmental aspects and less on social aspects compared to CSRD.

Australia

Australian companies often use the globally recognized Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards for their sustainability reporting, which provides comprehensive criteria for a variety of environmental, social and governance indicators. The Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) announced in June 2022 that it would develop its own sustainability disclosure standards. Mandatory climate reporting under AASB S2 (based on IFRS S2) has since applied in Australia from financial year 2025.

Comparison and convergence: A path to global sustainability?

While the CSRD provides a legally binding and standardized framework for companies in the EU, Australia, Asia and the Americas tend to show a more diverse and in some cases more voluntary approach. The European approach is stricter and more comprehensive, while standards in other regions show greater breadth and flexibility in implementation.

The differences in regional approaches to sustainability reporting reflect different economic, political and cultural contexts. However, despite these differences, there is increasing convergence towards globally harmonized reporting standards: the ISSB standards IFRS S1 and S2 are now the global reference framework on which many national rules are based. This signals a growing global consensus on the urgent need to drive sustainable development.

In a globalizing world, the differences and similarities between regional standards could not only be instructive, but also a catalyst for the development of a universal, internationally recognized framework for sustainability reporting.

Materiality analysis template

Ready to start your CSRD journey? Our Excel-based materiality analysis template helps you identify which sustainability topics are relevant for your company and meet ESRS requirements.

View template

Frequently asked questions about CSRD

What is the CSRD in simple terms?

The CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive) is an EU law that requires large companies to report on their environmental and social impact. Think of it as a standardized recipe book: it tells companies which sustainability information they must disclose and in what format, so investors and other stakeholders can compare companies fairly.

Which companies must report under the CSRD?

The Omnibus Directive has been in force since 18 March 2026: from financial year 2027, reporting is mandatory for companies with more than 1,000 employees AND more than €450m net turnover. Both criteria must be met. Non-EU groups are affected from financial year 2028 at the earliest if they generate more than €450m net turnover in the EU and have an EU subsidiary or branch with more than €200m turnover.

Are SMEs affected by the CSRD?

Most SMEs are not directly required to report under the updated rules. However, they can be indirectly affected. CSRD-obligated companies are required to report Scope 3 emissions across their value chain, which means they may ask their suppliers, including SMEs, to provide sustainability data. There is also a voluntary standard (VS, formerly VSME, in force since 24 September 2026) that SMEs can use to structure their sustainability disclosures.

How does CSRD compare to sustainability reporting in other countries?

The CSRD is the most legally binding and standardized sustainability reporting framework in the world. Globally, the ISSB standards IFRS S1/S2 (which absorbed the TCFD and CDSB) are the reference framework, alongside the GRI Standards. Countries such as Australia (AASB S2) and Japan (SSBJ) align with the ISSB, while the SEC climate rule in the USA is not in force. Many frameworks elsewhere are voluntary or less prescriptive.